The SCIET derives from a single measure, the Unitary Value of the distance between the center and the edge,  and defines all the space surrounding the center through equidistant angularities and subdivisions while retaining that definition of their existence together as a permanent record. The measure is as unlimited as the Awarness from which it came. There is no limit on smallness or largness except the speed of change itself. The SCIETs spatial structure is a Resonance Map that can be illustrated by the use of twenty tetrahedral forms attached together at a single virtice.The forms simulate the event horizon structure surrounding a tiny primeval single value blackhole, a continuing reaction of the void to the original charge intrusion. You might say that the SCIET is an isotope of black hole ``bubbles" that are  stimulated into existance by the presence of difference and stabalized by resonance.

Much of the information presented on the SCIET Dynamics web site is synopsized here in a conversational manner.  Links to pages with detailed graphical presentation are embedded for your convenience.

Some Basic Questions

Question: What is SCIET Dynamics?

Answer: It is a mathematical theory about how matter is created from the formless void of space, or from thought actually

Question: OK, but the popular theories start with the existence of matter and explain from there. Why is it necessary to begin with the "Void"?

Answer: Because the theories that start with matter cannot deal with anything that does not include matter in a causal role.

Question: So SCIET Dynamics is able to theorize in realms without matter?

Answer: Yes. It is derived from what is know about electromagnetics and gravity, the two forces that permeate space.

Question: Yes, but they aren't they the product of matter? How can you generalize about space without matter based on two forces that owe their existence to matter?

Answer: The theory depends on the ability of space to transmit these forces and how it does it, not on the forces themselves.

Question: What is it that is unique and original here?

Answer: The idea of twenty tetrahedral forms sharing a central point is the first and probably major new idea. Extending all the ideas that emerge from this creates many, many new concepts. It provides a starting point for the emergence of matter from the Void, allowing the Void to remain as a part of the material structure in the form of a balance point to the first intrusion, or difference in the void. The tetron is the basic form of emergence, but is unstable and moves into and out of existence. However, when grouped into twenty on a shared center point they create a sustainable intrusion from the Void, which I call the SCIETangle. The basic idea can be visualized with a model constructed of twenty tetrahedrons attached to a single center. The angles are not right to close the shape into a solid dodecahedron, they leave a gap which can be described as a pentagon at the vertices and a rectangle along the edges. The gap between the stable tetrahedral forms provides the instability that drives change presented here as the SCIET Cycle.

The tetrahedron is an ancient insight, but the idea about how it forms stable resonance patterns in sets of twenty is the new notion of SCIET Dynamics. Why it does this is as important as how.

At the conclusion of each cycle a portion of the energy that approached the center is bounced off and into an orbit of the center. It is this portion that remains from all movement that has accumulated to create the universe that we see. These are called by different names depending on their size and relationship, (SCIETorbitals, shells, layers,  levels, lattice,) but they are the same phenomenon. The SCIETorbital is a closed capacitance sphere, by this I mean it does not interact with anything else except its adjacent SCIETorbitals and others that are the same value. The term "SCIET" refers the the complete cycle beginning with the Void and ending with a SCIETorbital value.

Question: So why is SCIET theory needed?

Answer: We need to be able to explain why things are as they are , it is not enough to be able to predict what will happen in a physics experiment, we need an overarching theory which explains physics and links it with all phenomena in a way that is simple for everyone to understand. We need a better description of reality.

Question: Did you originate the SCIET Theory?

Answer: Yes, with the help of God, angels and plenty of reading. You can read about the details in an article titled ``Origins" on this website in the
Article Archive.

Background Information

Question: How did you get involved with this idea?

Answer: I decided to pursue ideas as career. I made a committment to information that would do the most good, and I prayed. I write about it in the
"Origins" section.

Question: Why did you choose the name SCIET ?

Answer: It's an acronym from Single Cycle Integrative Effect Topology. Phonetically it's pronounced "site" and I chose the acronym so that it would be pronounced that way as well as incorporating the root of science which means to know. The word "sight" and "site" both represent qualities that are in this concept. A good name must evoke a sense of foreknowledge. It needs to sound like what it is.  In latin it is the it is the third person plural of the formal verb to know .  ``they shall know ``

Question: Did you originate the SCIET math theory?

Answer: Yes, I've been working on it since 1974. I've really not met anyone working on anything similar.  I asked the initial question and pursued it independently of anyone else. The theory provides a rationale for consciousness as a quality of space, separate from biology. It provides a basis for the existence of angels, guides and generally the idea of conscious, god centered universe, so I have to believe that I had help from a higher source.

Question: How do you "prove" that the SCIET is valid?

Answer: I'll have to wait for others to do that. I'm not a scientist or mathematician, so my intent has been to present a whole theory from the perspective of common sense. As time passes people will point out errors and test the ideas. In time the truth will out.

Question: You have said that your goal was to scientifically prove the existence of spirit. Would you say that it was a religious quest?

Answer: It's a spiritual quest, and it's nature is such that doctrine creates preconceptions and artificial limits. So spiritual, yes and religious, no. But I expect churches to react to this positively. In essence it confirms what they have been saying all along.

Question: Why are you publishing this idea on the web?

Answer: The web is where the constituency for these types of ideas congregate. In the years that I've been working on this I've realized that you can't hurry curiosity. The information has to be there when someone is ready for it though. There may only be a few thousands of people in the whole world who are open to these ideas.

Math & Science related Q & A

Question: Is the SCIET math or science theory?

Answer: Neither and both. It's a reality theory. After I had the Gnostic insight I began looking for ideas that  are true in nature as well as with pure reason, and in that sense it works with both realms. Within a few months of having the vision I determined that I would build on common sense concepts and let others translate what I wrote into their language of choice. My task is to create a new language understandable by children and I felt that any effort to learn existing physics and math would subvert the clear presentation of the original vision.

Question: Was there a key insight that led you to the SCIET math theory?

Answer: One idea that was crucial, was the realization that twenty tetrahedrons could share a single point, forming a loose assembly that was both stable and unstable. The tetrahedron is the most stable and basic form in nature, so seeing it in a fundamental role was not much of a stretch. I've been working with that since 1975, so it's a key insight that needed a lot of work to support it.

Question: What does SCIET Dynamics add to science?

Answer: SCIET Dynamics provides a scientific rationale for the how and why of nature. It is a descriptive language that can relate matter, energy and spirit and allow us to understand what we cannot see, because it is a natural mathematical extrapolation of what we can see.

Question: You say that the SCIET is a kind of topology. Isn't that the kind of math used to describe surfaces?

Answer: Well, yes. I named it a long time ago when I was still struggling to explain what I could see. The SCIET describes the distribution of charge in space as a three dimensional effect rather than a two dimensional map. It is a 3D map of charge, so "topography" might be a stretch now, but it I am not sure what existing type of mathematical discipline it would be classified under. Recently I started using a coined term "Spacimetry"(space+metric) as a general heading. The SCIET describes the polarity values of all locations during a moment in space, so a more inclusive term is appropriate.

Question: How does the SCIET do that?

Answer: It's the nature of space itself, how space reacts to change, defined as polarity. You need to log on to my web site and study the presentation. I can explain it, but illustrations make it so much easier. I like to emphasize that the SCIET is the basic pattern of space, and it is not limited to generating the stationary fields with matter. All interactions generate them.

Question: Are atoms just one type of SCIET?

Answer: They are the most important type of SCIET. They are what I call Causal Level SCIETs, which generate descendant systems that relate only within their families. Each Causal Level SCIET has twelve levels that each creates a descendant system.  What we see as the surfaces of the proton and neutron is only one level. The electrons are the first descendant level and what we consider the visible universe is descended from these levels.

Question: How is gravity generated according to SCIET Dynamics?

Answer:  Gravity is due to resonance and dissonance of the SCIETorbital layers along a SCIETline between two bodies. In this sense there is both push and pull gravitational effect. For instance a ball is dropping toward the earth and as it gets closer to the earth it enter stronger SCIETorbital layers surrounding the planet and resonates more powerfully with them, while at the same time it becomes more dissonant with the other bodies whose gravitational fields affect it. It is pulled toward the resonant field and repelled from the dissonant bodies. The SCIET cycle distributes this resonance within the bodies through subdivisions of the whole expressed at every defined point.

Question: That sounds a lot like holography, what about that?

Answer: It does solve the riddle of holography. The secret is that the phase information is time delayed, basically there are twelve levels or phases present at the same time. At first I was not looking for an answer to holography, but rather I was trying to understand how a falling object could distribute the gravitational effect throughout the whole object as it moved toward the earth. That was one of my primary "thought problems".

I knew that the line between the points contained a full set of phases, and at the same time the integrative effect needed to move around the twelve angles and levels, stepping down in length up in rate, and that this requires time. So how could it do both simultaneously? It's like a snapshot, containing elements of the past, up to that moment. The secret is that the line is a continuous dynamic made of all "moments" being processed by the system, and each "step" is a complete sequence of time, rather than one moment broken in to twelve parts. So you might say that the center to center relationship generates a collapsing wave that spirals around the center. Light is absorbed in this way, with the waves collapsing into every available frequency within the absorbing system. The SCIET is directly the source of holographic images.

Question: I've read that New Age mathematics will use a base 12 system. How does the SCIET relate to this idea?

Answer: Well, the SCIET is base twelve in the sense that it has 12 angles and 12 levels of dynamics in play simultaneously in the externalizing mode. The internalizing mode, which balances the twelve, has twenty angles, each of which is between three externalizing angles.

I have not experimented with the arithmetical side of the idea.

Question: Are the twenty amino acids related to this?

Answer: Yes, the twenty receptive harmonics are the basis of these building block proteins. While it is obvious that there is a reason for these amino acids to be central to all organic structures, their ability to produce a phi resonance provides an attractive assimilating pulse into the surrrounding space one of the secrets of life. Utilizing the twenty receptive resonances of the SCIET, the amino acids supply the phi resonance to their linked structures.

Body, Mind & Spirit

Question: There are many leading edge ideas on the web that involve assumptions like the ones in SCIET Dynamics. The concept of "subspace"( a la Star Trek) has been used by Dr. Courtney Brown to explain Scientific Remote Viewing. How does SCIET Dynamics account for "subspace"?

Answer: That is a more modern term for what has been called the "ether", and yes, the Single Cycle Integrative Effect explains that. Basically we use a new mathematical form (the SCIET) to create a way to describe atomic structure and then extrapolate the existence of a realm of very high frequency stationary fields that are coexistent to the atoms. In effect, they are as much a product of creation as protons, neutrons and electrons. It actually comes from the nucleon's internal structure.

The ether was a fluid-like concept, while the reality is rooted in the relativistic ability of space to define a value of location, time and distance without interference from any except those on the same exact time and distance parameters.

The stationary fields that originated with the creation event extend over a broad range, of course, but the range that emanates from matter is specific and voluminous. This range is what creates the effects of gravity and consciousness throughout space.

Question: So you are saying that the ether is real, but that it is not a fluid-like medium, but a realm of specific values?

Answer: Yes, and there are literally countless consequent values that have evolved from the original. That's where the dimensions or planes come from.

Question: OK, the "Big Bang" which created the universe has its own stationary field of subspace?

Answer: Wait, the big bang created A universe, not THE universe. And yes there is a value that was established then which is the basis of our "cosmic consciousness".

Question: OK, that must mean that a soul, or a "being" is a SCIET, a stationary field. Is it one that originated with the big bang?

Answer: I don't know. But I think not necessarily, beingness is something that ought to be able to transit formation events.

Question: Are we talking about the concept of god here?

Answer: I am talking of theoretics, God is a not a concept I address as a theory. God IS all that IS. I'm introducing a new language to discuss creation. The SCIET is just a kind of descriptor, like the words HERE and THERE. If you were able to continually define HERE with greater and greater precision, like when you point at something and the fingertip on your extended arm covers the area you're pointing at, and as you get closer, a smaller, more specific area is defined, ad infinitum.

Question: OK. Let's get back to Brown's Scientific Remote Viewing work at the Farsight Institute. You've read his book "Cosmic Voyage", are his assertions consistent with SCIET Dynamics?

Answer: Yes, the notion of simultaneous time is understandable as is the mobility of the viewer throughout space, but perceptions of the future are more like our collective plans than anything else. It's limited to the present extended forward. We can change our plans.

Question: Right. So how can a viewer visit any place and time?

Answer: The same way that you remember what happened to you yesterday- the universe is like a big mind. The difference between our experience of memory and thought with our brains and the experience of Remote Viewing is less than you might think. The SCIET provides a methodology for the brain to act as a transceiver to the mind which exists as a field centered within the brain. Our experience of consciousness is therefore a quality of the field, as is our memory. The firing of the synapses is both tuning and recording in this field. So we are talking about a process of memory and thinking that is outside of our bodies in space and time, but based on the very same principles, in which the future is a probable reality, rather than a certainty.

Question: How does SCIET Dynamics deal with Numerology?

Answer: Cultural archetypes are part of the collective field of consciousness, so the values that are assigned are relevant to the group mind within which they emerge. Our alphabet is shared in the same way by all English speaking peoples, each letter appears in same order, the same name and shape, so the collective sameness does trigger vibrational qualities in the mind that transcend the individuals experience. They form a sort of vibrational code separate from individual intent.

Question: I have seen many references to the number three as being a particularly significant number. Does SCIET Dynamics explain the importance of Three?

Answer: Yes, it embodies the creative principle. SCIET Dynamics always exists in space in a three dimensional state, and the idea of a plane or a surface doesn't apply, so the three is the result of the harmony of two spheres of effect. It is the vibrational harmonic that is created at the midpoint, where two points in space balance. All that is, is the result of the midpoint, of three. You have to study the SCIET to grasp the sense in which I am speaking of three here.

Question: What is the significance of the ten numerals in SCIET Dynamics?

Answer: That will take too long to answer here, but each number corresponds to a specific state of being or vibration. The SCIET uses twelve as a base and they are parts of a whole, as well as marks of sequence.

Question: Astrology is explained by SCIET Dynamics then?

Answer: Most definitely, the SCIET accounts for all the space surrounding a point, like astrology. I studied astrology for many years because it is alone in human culture as a clear example of the principles of SCIET Dynamics in action. Nothing else comes close.

Question: What about Sacred Geometry and SCIET Dynamics?

Answer: Systems of resonance and the balance of polarities create the forms of SCIET Dynamics. Sacred Geometry venerates the same forms, except that the SCIET is not recognized, but the relationship of the icosahedron and the do decahedron hint at it. The Golden Ratio or phi (1.618) is a pivotal component of SCIET Dynamics, holding a key insight about the relationship of the internal and external fields. You should see the tetron and PHI part of the SCIET presentation for a better understanding of that.

If you have a Question about SCIET Dynamics, please send it via electronic mail to dane@sciet.com