|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luminiferous Aether...What is it?
Britannica's definition AETHER - also called luminiferous ether, in physics, a theoretical, universal substance believed during the 19th century to act as the medium for transmission of electromagnetic waves (e.g., light and X rays) much as sound waves are transmitted by elastic media such as air. The ether was assumed to be weightless, transparent, frictionless, undetectable chemically or physically, and literally permeating all...
The aether.......exactly how does this work?
Where is the Aether?
The intertia of the fabric of space (Creation Substance) is often called the ``ether". In SCIET Dynamics all effects are treated as one-on-one frequency reactions between resonant centers. These reactions fill space with a lattice work of frequencies that we can see (the visible universe) and frequencies that we cannot see ( dark matter, dark energy). |
|
Stuck already?
There is no aether. There is a way to understand how there appears to be an aether though.
There is a minimum unit that is shared by everything.
Every point (object, thing, etc) in space is a prime number based on that assumption, sharing only that minimum unit value with any other point in space and each and every interaction between points in space is treated as a single event between two prime numbers.
Each point is able to interact with any number of other points individually and simultaneously.
Change in relationship is calculated (resonates) when a shared value based on the primes moves off center relationship.
Because the minimum unit is the product of the subdivision of space from the creation event all measures that exist began as the minimum unit. If you think about this mathematically, its implications should be clear.
The aether is the result of these ongoing relationships and the remnants of their existence since the creation event. Special relativity assumes similar conditions between the observer and what is being observed. Only a one-to-one relationship between all points in space can satisfy this requirement. If any aether exists it must be part of a specific field created by the observer and the rest of the universe being observed. It is not a "medium", but a relativistic condition of space in which all points are at the center of their own history of change.
While this concept enables much of the same speculation about what can exist in space that cannot be seen or detected by instrumental science it is much different than the "luminescent ether".
As an alternative to the aether, SCIET Dynamics postulates three initial levels or stages of creation before the Big Bang; the Awareness, the Creation Substance (Source Field, Void), and Relationship. Each of the first three stages are considered to be qualities of the Aether, but most of the confusion in science is between the qualities of the source field and the defined Relationships based on the formatting of the Source Field by the intention of Awareness.
Separating the stages of creation before the Culmination (Big Bang) enables a clear perception of the what and how of movement through space.
Additionally, within SCIET Dynamics, after the Culmination,(Big Bang) there is Agreement (defined as natural law based on the existence of matter.), Memory (defined as the higher frequencies, life for instance, that exist as a result of Agreement in the form of molectular bonding.) and Conciousness, which combines natural law or Agreement with Memory (commonly called the fifth dimension). All of the stages compound upon the qualities of all prior stages.
The above is a rewrite of the original article to clarify the ideas in today's (2012) terms. Below is the original message and response.
<ar7K8.16945$LC3.1206740@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, "Laurent" <cyberdyno4@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Britannica's definition: > > AETHER - also called luminiferous ether, in physics, a theoretical, > universal substance believed during the 19th century to act as the > medium for transmission of electromagnetic waves (e.g., light and X > rays) much as sound waves are transmitted by elastic media such as > air. The ether was assumed to be weightless, transparent, > frictionless, undetectable chemically or physically, and literally > permeating all... > ************************* > > The aether must permeate everything, the aether is everywhere by its > own definition, you can't conceive a fragmentable aether, or it would > not be the aether as it was defined thousands of years ago. By > definition, everything is made from the aether, even the space that > surrounds you. This definition is what makes GTR (General Theory of > Relativity) true, since everything is *related* thru the aether. Or > how could it be that, just because you are in an accelerated state, > time and length *must change* in relation to a stationary observer. > Wasn't space supposed to be an absolute, or primary, independent and > non-derivable from anything else?
the aether.......exactly how does this work?
Stuck already?
There is no aether. There is a way to understand how there appears to be an aether though.
There is a minimum unit that is shared by everything.
Every point (object, thing, etc) in space is a prime number based on that assumption, sharing only that minimum unit value with any other point in space.
Each and every interaction between points in space is treated as a single event between two prime numbers.
Each point is able to interact with any number of other like points individually and simultaneously.
Change in relationship is calculated (resonates) when a shared value based on the primes moves off center relationship.
Because the minimum unit is the product of the subdivision of space from the creation event all measures that exist began as the minimum unit. If you think about this mathematically, its implications should be clear.
The aether is the result of these ongoing relationships and the remnants of their existence since the creation event. Special relativity assumes similar conditions between the observer and what is being observed. Only a one-to-one relationship between all points in space can satisfy this requirement. If any aether exists it must be part of a specific field created by the observer and the rest of the universe being observed. It is not a "medium", but a relativistic condition of space in which all points are at the center of their own history of change.
While this concept enables much of the same speculation about what can exist in space that cannot be seen or detected by instrumental science it is much different than the "luminescent ether".
> Space doesn't exist by itself, neither does time nor matter. I am not > saying they are not real, they are as real as they can be. They just > can't exist independently from each other. > > There are no parts when you refer to the aether, you can see electric > fields, magnetic fields, gravitational fields, or any kind of field > force as different 'things' or 'parts' all made from the same aether. > The aether is an active dynamical medium that can stretch and > compress, it is a continuous medium that abhors fragmentation even > though it is infinitely divisible.
Space, time, matter are derived from the process that began with the first subdivision.
There are only parts when you refer to the ether. Because we cannot conceive of or measure change in discrete units does not mean that the discrete units do not exist. It is important to realize that the simultaneous overlay of change on all levels of discrete units would appear to be non-discrete.
> Even though is not the same (because the aether is not a particulated > medium), you can compare the movement of matter through it to the > movement of waves in a pond, in the sense that what is moving is the > FORM, the INFORMATION that gives its particular shape to the wave. A > similar thing happens with a radio wave, or a cellular phone wave, it > is the information contained in the SHAPE of the EM wave which the > radio tuner has to decode in order to play. > > When an object like the Moon displaces through the aether, it is the > information that gives the Moon its particular material properties > which is moving through the aether, not the aether itself.
Movement of matter in space is based on a subset of rules that apply to matter since they are based on values derived from the proton which is itself derived from the minimum units' interactions. Movement is measured from the proton on a substrate of minimum unit potentials.
Information is transferred between points through the simultaneous overlay of all levels of units that surround each point. Each point is at the center of its own history that it shares through the merging of minimum unit values, a process too extensive to describe in this post.
> At the quantum level, even the measuring apparatus would be very > difficult to separate from the measured event, and if you are looking > for the aether you have to go by quantum mechanical parameters, since > you can't look for an aether at the classical level. You can measure > for the properties of fields, but you can't measure for the > *presence* of the aether in one given location since by definition it > must permeate *everything* there is. > > Things move but not in respect to the aether, things move in respect > to other things at the classical level, but that loses meaning at the > quantum level, the level at which the aether exists and manifests > itself as one single entity.
Measure at the quantum and subquantum level can be extropolated from large events if you have the right model.
The "aether" is entirely derived from movement. Change since the beginning as recorded in space is what the "aether" is.
> Space and matter are both made of aether, so whether I try to measure > the velocity of an object with respect to space or in respect to > itself is all the same, I would still get a big zero, as our hero > Michelson had to find out the hard way. He was trying to measure a > drag when there was none, because he thought the Earth and space were > two separated entities, he saw an Earth moving IN an aether, when the > Earth is really the aether itself. > > **the Aether is the physical, non-material substance which is the > source of material particles and hence all material bodies.** > > The difference between being and existing, is that... to be... you > don't need to be somewhere, while to exist... you do. > > To exist... your location must be certain, so you must exist above the > Planck scale (less uncertainties). > > To be... you don't even need to be physical. Right? *But all you need > to be physical is to be able to act as a force. Like a field with no > volume would still exist in hyperspace, as it has extension but no > volume, until another field spawns orthogonally to it, to create a > volume. > > A physical material substance will occupy space, because it has a > volume. > > The physical but nonmaterial substance does not occupy any space. It > doesn't exist IN spacetime, because it IS spacetime, it doesn't exist > but it IS. > > The physical nonmaterial substance becomes a physical material > substance by means of spinning fields at very high speeds, creating > the properties of volume, mass, gravity, solidity, light... and > spacetime. > > Space is an extension of matter. Space tells matter what to do, and > matter tells space what to do. > > REAL is the PROCESS that relates space, time and matter to create OUR > reality. > > The Universe is one single entity. Its space... its objects... Us, its > all one thing, which by definition, you could call the Aether. > > -- > Laurent
Interesting post. You have addressed a number of ideas that I've heard on the aether. Thanks for creating the opportunity to discuss this topic.
Dane M Arr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|