We still laugh about that.

She was right. Her place was about feeding people's hunger and not about hanging out.  And that's how I feel about dealing with skeptics. The net seems to be filled with people who have nothing better to do than try to insult other people based on the smallest bit of information with which they disagree.

People like that will find much to complain about on this site.

I am a designer and not a scientist or mathematician. However it is normal for important, even breakthrough, ideas in a field to come from outside the profession. I hope that is the case here.

The SCIET is based on a previously unexploited observation regarding the tetrahedron. When twenty of them are placed so that they all connect on a single point, they make a loose icosahedral form. It is a form with limited instability, since its sub components are stable alone. This fact alone is useless without the concepts, principles and rules of SCIET Dynamics, but with them it turns out to be a very powerful insight into the nature of Nature.

The scope of this project is well beyond the reasonable expectations for a single individual. I know this. For years I have wanted to find peers with which to confide and work with to perfect these ideas before sharing them with the world. But who is working on a similar idea, or even using a similar approach? I would enjoy working with others, but until I could make a functional explanation of my own thoughts available, it was only frustrating to engage them about this subject. 

I believe that the SCIET is the Mathematical Atom, that it is a cellular automata, a pattern whose simple rules compound into and underlie all natural cycles and explain what is missing from our modern cosmologies. Its postulations create a scientific rationale for the existence of information in space without matter, the nature of consciousness, formation of matter from the Void, and the character and nature of dark matter and dark energy, just for a start.

 These were the original goals of the project when it began in 1974, to find the ``structure of energy". Has this really been accomplished with SCIET Dynamics? Only time and the efforts of a disbelieving scientific community will tell.

People worldwide see the progress made by humanity, but see two different realities.  Some see a world filled with questions, while others see a world of existing answers that need only be applied.

I respect skepticism, but the mindless acceptance of whatever is written in a book or taught in a class and then parroted as the final word about nature does not deserve respect. Nor do the staged experiments that seem to prove one thing to be true and another not., all the while knowingly ignoring much that would invalidate their assumptions.

Skeptics pretend to be the arbiters of truth, but defend materialism as their holy mantra, gauging all information by the rules of experimental physics. If they would apply their rules to themselves would have to stop speaking, since they would not be able to assert the reality of their own mind. Disregarding all subjective experience as nonscientific is illogical and...well...arrogant. Observation and statistics are the basis of QM and to pretend that these techniques are useless in regard to ``subjective experience" is a pretentious falsehood.

If you are someone who feels questions not rooted in pure materialism are a foolish waste of time, this site is for you too.  You may find this material unwelcome because it validates ideas long reviled by the scientific establishment.  However, the Universe IS as it IS. Pretending that truth will go away because it disagrees with your preconceptions is a child's game.

This site builds a case for a conscious, god centered universe, in which human (and other...) consciousness is a continuity that changes but does not end.   Many who grasp the scientific view are threatened by this notion. They should ask themselves why the idea of a creator consciousness and an afterlife are disturbing. These people should also know not to bother writing nasty letters to this site, they won't  be read and no response will be forthcoming.  As the comedian Mike Myers, in his SNL skit  about his aunt would say,  ``Talk among yourselves..."