The SCIET derives from a single measure, the Unitary Value of the distance between the center and the edge,  and defines all the space surrounding the center through equidistant angularities and subdivisions while retaining that definition of their existence together as a permanent record. The measure is as unlimited as the Awarness from which it came. There is no limit on smallness or largness except the speed of change itself.

The SCIETs spatial structure is a Resonance Map that can be illustrated by the use of twenty tetrahedral forms attached together at a single virtice.

The forms simulate the event horizon structure surrounding a tiny primeval single value blackhole, a continuing reaction of the void to the original charge intrusion. You might say that the SCIET is an isotope of black hole ``bubbles" that are  stimulated into existance by the presence of difference and stabalized by resonance.

 

Introductory Articles Over the years I have written many introductions to SCIET Dynamics. Some are better than others, but all are too brief to to provide much more than a hint about the ideas within its scope. Forward 2013: The first article was written for the original SCIET Dynamics website and later revised. It seeks to ground the reader in the conceptual approach from which the project originated. History of the SCIET Presentation 1996 This presentation is about a new approach to describing the physical and non-physical world. Although this is done by proposing a new mathematical tool called the SCIET, it is far more than a new math.  Reconceptualizing creation as a SCIET based event, It becomes a new way of seeing the Universe. What exists in the universe can be discovered through an understanding of the SCIET and its Dynamics. This article  was composed to be posted to Internet news groups. It may still have that purpose. Internet Introduction 2001 Group  Thank you for opening this message. Since 1974 I have been working on a solution to the ``information in empty space" problem or what I started out calling ``the structure of energy".  My initial visualization was of a way for light to stand still. It was my immediate impression on having this thought the answer would also provide a basis for the existence of spirit and the continuity of consciousness. I am very fortunate that I have had the time to think through the implications that the existence of  such structure in space has for our understanding of nature. The Design of Reality was written to engage the reader in a way that frames the questions addressed on the web site. The Design of Reality 2002 Backward Engineering Nature Backward engineering usually means to deconstruct a product in an effort to understand how it works. Often this leads to a better design based on the accomplishments of the other product. This works best when the level of knowledge is equal between the parties. When it is not, the process becomes lost in confusion. Imagine an 1840 era scientist trying to understand a Palm Pilot. It is a process that depends on comprehension of the manufacture's techniques. So can we backward engineer nature? A Brief Presentation was written in 1995 as the first chapter of an unpublished work in progress named ``In the SCIET of God". The book's theme was a little over-ambitious for a first work, since it was its intent to explain how the Universe was in fact the Mind of God as understood from how SCIET Dynamics explains the origin and function of the human mind. A Brief Presentation of a New Mathematical Idea June 1995 The need for a mathematical tool capable of describing nature in its totality is long-standing.  Among the conceptual difficulties are initial assumptions that can create the universe from nothingness, instead of beginning with the existence of particles in space. A system that will do this goes beyond mathematics and into the realm of pure knowledge, confronting cherished beliefs about origins, destinies and all of the mechanisms in between.  And clearly, a tool to relate all our experience must simplify while simultaneously allowing all the complexity in the universe. Its clarity will be elegant and to the point. The effort to discover the structure of energy, or how light stands still, encountered many conceptual problems. Existing terms and metrics, biased toward their original purpose, burden a new explanation with confusing interpretation. Often, new terms are needed to convey the ideas presented here, and they will be explained in the context of that discussion